Starker realities here - The Decline of The West, vectored via this US-NATO-UK Ukrainian Proxy War over the lives of the poor Ukrainian people to bring down the Russian State, tip out its government and expropriate its vast resources - failed.
________________
Expressed further under the Decline of The West, vectored via that failed, longest of the long LongShots, this engineered US-NATO-UK Ukrainian Proxy War over the lives of the poor Ukrainian people to weaken Russia, tip out its government and possess its considerable resources.
Judgment shall be by outcomes. Thus far, it is the EU and NATO that will disintegrate. Paradoxically, the present winners are simultaneously the United States and Russia. Those in the way of superpower aspirations invariably are ground up in the geo-political machinery.
Discussed here in lengthy, abstruse and eclectic prose across several essays that will leave the reader visibly aged, yet possibly far wiser although admittedly that is entirely speculative . . . https://les7eb.substack.com
Nato – en antivit och familjefientlig institution . . .
Efter apokalypsen 1945 har som bekant en rad globala organisationer bildats med syfte att upprätthålla och expandera den totalitära liberalismen. En av de tidigaste organisationer som bildades i detta syfte var krigsalliansen ”Nordatlantiska fördragsorganisationen”, eller Nato, som kan ses som globalismens militära gren.
Förutom att försäkra att Washington alltid har internationellt stöd för sina militära kampanjer är Nato som institution uttalat antivit och uttryckligen dedikerad till ”raslig rättvisa” för rasfrämlingar som bor i vita länder. Redan 1999 författade Nato rapporter där man skyller en rad moderna problem på nationalister och varnar för nationalismens inflytande.
Under 2023 höll krigsalliansen ett toppmöte på högkvarteret i Bryssel om ras där krigsalliansens ledare bedyrade att bekämpa ”homogena attityder” och att man skulle använda Natos ”kollektiva underrättelseinformation” för ändamålet.
Faktum är att Nato är så dedikerat till sin antivita agenda att man öppet förespråkar att institutioner måste omformas för att bli ”inkluderande”, med andra ord omstruktureras för att bli mer antivita och bestå av färre vita anställda och chefer.
Feb 26, 2022·edited Feb 26, 2022Liked by Brian McGlinchey
A promise made by a democracy is called a treaty. The US has stacks of them with Russia. Why would anyone, in the US or Russia, think that a single voice was representative of the actions of that democracy to such a degree that that one voice could make a promise for everyone? And why would they believe it meaningful if it, unlike the many other instances, wasn't ratified as a treaty? Claiming a grievance because such a "promise" was broken is just bizarre.
You're quite write that Russia should have insisted on something beyond vigorous verbal assurances. Although, as Trump's prompt abandonment of the Iran deal demonstrates, even that isn't necessarily too much of a safeguard.
NATO – an anti-white and anti-family institution . . .
After the apocalypse of 1945, a number of global organizations have been formed with the aim of maintaining and expanding totalitarian liberalism. One of the earliest organizations formed for this purpose was the war alliance "North Atlantic Treaty Organization", or NATO, which can be seen as the military wing of globalism.
In addition to ensuring that Washington always has international support for its military campaigns, NATO as an institution is explicitly anti-white and explicitly dedicated to "racial justice" for racial aliens living in white countries. As early as 1999, NATO authored reports blaming nationalists for a number of modern problems and warning against the influence of nationalism.
In 2023, the war alliance held a summit at its headquarters in Brussels on race where the alliance's leaders pledged to fight "homogeneous attitudes" and to use NATO's "collective intelligence" for the purpose.
In fact, NATO is so dedicated to its anti-white agenda that it openly advocates that institutions must be reshaped to be "inclusive," in other words, restructured to be more anti-white, and consist of fewer white employees and executives.
No. You're quite right that Russia should have insisted on not merely an oral or written political commitment, but a ratified treaty (with some sort of consequence upon unilateral NATO termination/violation, though I can't imagine what that would be. Cash?)
Documents leaked from Soros’ “Open Society Foundation” show how the Jewish billionaire behind Hillary Clinton gave orders to the State Department and manipulated media coverage of events in Ukraine . . .
For those who'd like to take a deeper dive, here's a very interesting lecture ("Why is Ukraine the West's Fault?") by University of Chicago Professor John Mearsheimer:
Feb 2, 2022·edited Feb 2, 2022Liked by Brian McGlinchey
I wonder who compiled that ethnolinguistic map of Ukraine.
I lived there for many years and traveled all over the country and I almost never heard Ukrainian spoken, except in Galicia. "How do you say that in Ukrainian?" was a running joke. For that matter, I was at the signing of an agreement between a Ukrainian businessman (born and raised in Kiev) and a member of the Yushchenko Administration. I don't know where he was from.
Because Ukrainian law required contracts to be written in Ukrainian or a Ukrainian counterpart, both parties asked me to explain the meanings of common Ukrainian words in the contract.
Very good take Brian.
Starker realities here - The Decline of The West, vectored via this US-NATO-UK Ukrainian Proxy War over the lives of the poor Ukrainian people to bring down the Russian State, tip out its government and expropriate its vast resources - failed.
________________
Expressed further under the Decline of The West, vectored via that failed, longest of the long LongShots, this engineered US-NATO-UK Ukrainian Proxy War over the lives of the poor Ukrainian people to weaken Russia, tip out its government and possess its considerable resources.
Judgment shall be by outcomes. Thus far, it is the EU and NATO that will disintegrate. Paradoxically, the present winners are simultaneously the United States and Russia. Those in the way of superpower aspirations invariably are ground up in the geo-political machinery.
Discussed here in lengthy, abstruse and eclectic prose across several essays that will leave the reader visibly aged, yet possibly far wiser although admittedly that is entirely speculative . . . https://les7eb.substack.com
____________________________
Nato – en antivit och familjefientlig institution . . .
Efter apokalypsen 1945 har som bekant en rad globala organisationer bildats med syfte att upprätthålla och expandera den totalitära liberalismen. En av de tidigaste organisationer som bildades i detta syfte var krigsalliansen ”Nordatlantiska fördragsorganisationen”, eller Nato, som kan ses som globalismens militära gren.
Förutom att försäkra att Washington alltid har internationellt stöd för sina militära kampanjer är Nato som institution uttalat antivit och uttryckligen dedikerad till ”raslig rättvisa” för rasfrämlingar som bor i vita länder. Redan 1999 författade Nato rapporter där man skyller en rad moderna problem på nationalister och varnar för nationalismens inflytande.
Under 2023 höll krigsalliansen ett toppmöte på högkvarteret i Bryssel om ras där krigsalliansens ledare bedyrade att bekämpa ”homogena attityder” och att man skulle använda Natos ”kollektiva underrättelseinformation” för ändamålet.
Faktum är att Nato är så dedikerat till sin antivita agenda att man öppet förespråkar att institutioner måste omformas för att bli ”inkluderande”, med andra ord omstruktureras för att bli mer antivita och bestå av färre vita anställda och chefer.
https://nordfront.se/nato-en-antivit-och-familjefientlig-institution
A promise made by a democracy is called a treaty. The US has stacks of them with Russia. Why would anyone, in the US or Russia, think that a single voice was representative of the actions of that democracy to such a degree that that one voice could make a promise for everyone? And why would they believe it meaningful if it, unlike the many other instances, wasn't ratified as a treaty? Claiming a grievance because such a "promise" was broken is just bizarre.
You're quite write that Russia should have insisted on something beyond vigorous verbal assurances. Although, as Trump's prompt abandonment of the Iran deal demonstrates, even that isn't necessarily too much of a safeguard.
NATO – an anti-white and anti-family institution . . .
After the apocalypse of 1945, a number of global organizations have been formed with the aim of maintaining and expanding totalitarian liberalism. One of the earliest organizations formed for this purpose was the war alliance "North Atlantic Treaty Organization", or NATO, which can be seen as the military wing of globalism.
In addition to ensuring that Washington always has international support for its military campaigns, NATO as an institution is explicitly anti-white and explicitly dedicated to "racial justice" for racial aliens living in white countries. As early as 1999, NATO authored reports blaming nationalists for a number of modern problems and warning against the influence of nationalism.
In 2023, the war alliance held a summit at its headquarters in Brussels on race where the alliance's leaders pledged to fight "homogeneous attitudes" and to use NATO's "collective intelligence" for the purpose.
In fact, NATO is so dedicated to its anti-white agenda that it openly advocates that institutions must be reshaped to be "inclusive," in other words, restructured to be more anti-white, and consist of fewer white employees and executives.
https://nordfront.se/nato-en-antivit-och-familjefientlig-institution
Was that Iran deal a treaty ratified by Congress like the many treaties the US has with Russia?
No. You're quite right that Russia should have insisted on not merely an oral or written political commitment, but a ratified treaty (with some sort of consequence upon unilateral NATO termination/violation, though I can't imagine what that would be. Cash?)
Documents leaked from Soros’ “Open Society Foundation” show how the Jewish billionaire behind Hillary Clinton gave orders to the State Department and manipulated media coverage of events in Ukraine . . .
https://nationalvanguard.org/2016/09/documents-show-soros-ran-us-foreign-policy-on-post-coup-ukraine/
For those who'd like to take a deeper dive, here's a very interesting lecture ("Why is Ukraine the West's Fault?") by University of Chicago Professor John Mearsheimer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrMiSQAGOS4
Zelensky, Biden, Satanism, War, Greed, Theft, Propaganda, Domestic Spying, International Intrigue, Treason, Sedition, FTX, Ukraine, Israel . . . https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/zelensky-biden-satanism-war-greed
It must be very difficult run a created country not even developed in those few years their own language.
I wonder who compiled that ethnolinguistic map of Ukraine.
I lived there for many years and traveled all over the country and I almost never heard Ukrainian spoken, except in Galicia. "How do you say that in Ukrainian?" was a running joke. For that matter, I was at the signing of an agreement between a Ukrainian businessman (born and raised in Kiev) and a member of the Yushchenko Administration. I don't know where he was from.
Because Ukrainian law required contracts to be written in Ukrainian or a Ukrainian counterpart, both parties asked me to explain the meanings of common Ukrainian words in the contract.
I explained in Russian.
Volodymyr Zelensky is an Israeli operative, the Ukrainian parliament is full of Jewish apparatchiks.
Ukraine’s Azov Regiment Visits Israel: ‘Mariupol is our Masada’ . . . https://nationalvanguard.org/2022/12/ukraines-azov-regiment-visits-israel-mariupol-is-our-masada/
Very interesting, thanks for the anecdotes!
Thank you for the detailed, comprehensive, and what should be to most a thoroughly convincing analysis.
Many thanks!