Flurry of Calls Among Saudi Diplomatic Staff and Spy Coincided With 9/11 Hijackers’ US Arrival
Future al Qaeda cleric Anwar al-Awlaki also connected
This is my second article based on an examination of several hundred recently-declassified documents from the FBI’s investigation of Saudi government links to 9/11. The first was FBI Mistakenly Names Saudi Consulate Employee Eyed in 9/11 Investigation.
FBI agents investigating Saudi ties to 9/11 discovered a set of phone calls among Saudi embassy and consulate officials, an extremist American cleric and a Saudi agent in San Diego—calls that took place in the weeks leading up to the first two hijackers’ arrival in Los Angeles and while they were settling in.
The timing raises suspicions of a premeditated scheme to shepherd the hijackers into American life—and some of the call participants personally did just that.
The phone links are described across thousands of pages of FBI documents released between September 2021 and April 2022. Many of the documents are from Operation Encore, an FBI investigation of Saudi government ties to the 9/11 plotters.
The first two hijackers to reach the United States were Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi, who acted as “muscle” hijackers on American Airlines Flight 77, which struck the Pentagon.
According to a 2008 Operation Encore document, “multiple San Diego sources and other individuals associated with al-Mihdhar and al-Hazmi during their time in southern California believed that the two hijackers must have been given ‘tazkia’ prior to arriving in the United States.”
The document defines “tazkia” as one person’s vouching for another. Someone already in America “would then, because of this individual’s relationship with the tazkia-providing individual, have provided any and all assistance that al-Mihdhar and al-Hazmi would need during their time in the United States.”
Hazmi and Mihdhar spoke very little English upon their arrival, to the extent of not even being able to read street signs. The two hijackers’ “only qualifications appeared to be support for [Osama bin Laden] and their ability to obtain visas,” says an FBI report.
Given their unfamiliarity with the United States and its language, it seems certain these first two hijackers on U.S. soil would have indeed needed help from people already in the country.
That help came, and phone records suggest it was pre-arranged, facilitated and supervised by Saudi government officials, employees and an intelligence asset.
Mihdhar and Hazmi arrived in Los Angeles in January 2000. Soon after, one of the men involved in the flurry of phone calls, Omar al-Bayoumi, met the two, invited them to move to San Diego, and facilitated their renting of an apartment and other facets of becoming situated in the United States.
A 2017 FBI document declared that “recent source information confirmed that al-Bayoumi was, at the time of the 9/11 attacks, employed as a paid cooptee of Saudi Arabian intelligence services.” A 2006 document says he later provided “substantial financial support” to a Kurdish Salafist group formed by former al Qaeda and Taliban members.
In addition to Bayoumi, another key figure in the Operation Encore files was Fahad al-Thumairy, an official at the Saudi consulate in Los Angeles described as a “Salafi fanatic.”
Thumairy was at the center of a burst of phone activity leading up to and following the hijackers’ arrival. According to an Operation Encore document:
“During a three-day period at the end of December 1999, approximately two and a half weeks prior to the arrival of Al-Mihdhar and al-Hazmi, Al-Thumairy made a number of phone calls that are significant in that the pattern of contact, including individuals and frequency, does not appear to have been duplicated prior to nor after this date.” . . .
“[Southern District of New York] feels that these telephonic contacts prior to the arrival of al-Mihdhar and al-Hazmi are an important turning point in these investigations. It shows a prior relationship between these individuals who, in the upcoming months, have extensive telephonic and face-to-face contact with al-Mihdhar and al-Hazmi.”
Twenty-one calls involving Thumairy during this time included contacts with:
Bayoumi, the Saudi intelligence asset who helped the hijackers
Anwar al-Awlaki, a U.S. citizen who later rose to infamy as an al-Qaeda cleric and organizer killed in a 2011 drone strike in Yemen. In 2000, Awlaki was an imam at a southern California mosque. He’d later move to northern Virginia at a time when some of the hijackers had also situated themselves there.
A “Somali/Yemeni student” in San Diego whose name is redacted. While redactions always leave some uncertainty, the document appears to indicate this individual’s phone had contact with a phone number in Yemen that served as an international al Qaeda switchboard.
The Saudi embassy in Washington
The Islamic Affairs section at the Saudi embassy
While the first document doesn’t name the individuals Thumairy talked to at the Saudi embassy in Washington, another file indicates his contacts there included:
Adel al-Sadhan, an Islamic Affairs section employee working for Mussaed al-Jarrah, another Saudi embassy official of FBI interest. “Al-Sadhan is believed to help al-Jarrah support extremist Saudi Sunnis in the United States,” said the FBI.
Mutaib al-Sudairy, an embassy administrative officer who later moved to Kansas and lived with an al Qaeda procurement officer said to have provided the phones used in the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in Africa.
According to an FBI report:
“[REDACTED] along with telephone and financial analysis, indicates Al-Sadhan and al-Sudairy may have assisted in laying the groundwork for the arrival of al-Hazmi and al-Mihdhar in southern California and served as an advance team to vet those who would later assist both hijackers.”
Their alleged advance team activity extended well before the hijackers arrived.
A 2010 FBI report says Sadhan first visited Los Angeles and Thumairy in December 1998: “Investigators believe his visit was to begin preparations for al-Thumairy’s subsequent assistance to al-Hazmi and al-Mihdhar.” Another document says Sudairy and Sadhan visited San Diego for six weeks in the summer of 1999 and were hosted by Bayoumi.
On December 12, 1999—about a month before the hijackers arrived—a Saudi individual named al-Jraithen arrived in Los Angeles and was registered at a hotel where Bayoumi was also registered.
Phone records point to Thumairy, Bayoumi and Awlaki being involved with Jraithen’s visit, along with another Los Angeles consulate employee, Mohammed al-Muhanna, who’s elsewhere described as an “Islamic extremist associated with a radical form of Salafi ideology” and who is “heavily connected/linked to Saudi Sunni extremists operating inside the U.S.”
An FBI agent, after noting some redacted indications that Jraithen’s visit held great importance, wrote, “It is possible that al-Jraithen provided the tazkia for al-Mihdar and al-Hazmi, ensuring that when the hijackers arrived the following month, they were taken care of by a network of individuals in Southern California.”
The hijackers arrived in Los Angeles on January 13, 2000. According to a 2008 FBI document, a “confidential human source” told investigators about a call from overseas made to the King Fahad Mosque in Los Angeles where al-Thumairy was an imam.
The source said someone asked for al-Thumairy and stated “the guys” were coming and needed to be picked up at the airport; the source understood “the guys” was a reference to Mihdhar and Hazmi.
FBI files say a man named “Johar”—likely Mohammed Johar—was “tasked” by Thumairy to pick up the hijackers at LAX and “take care of them during their time in Los Angeles.” Two days after their arrival, Thumairy made several calls to Saudi Arabia.
About two weeks after the hijackers landed, Bayoumi first met them at a Mediterranean restaurant in Los Angeles. He invited them to move to San Diego, where he lived.
Bayoumi later told U.S. investigators it was a chance encounter, but it came within a couple hours after he had a meeting at the Saudi consulate with an employee described as having “extremist views.” As Stark Realities was first to report last month, in its declassification, the FBI inadvertently revealed that man’s name is “Mana.”
On that same pivotal day, Bayoumi had a six-minute call with the Saudi embassy. He also received a $10,000 wire transfer from a man the FBI believed to be a brother-in-law who “worked for the PC.” It’s not clear what that abbreviation means. One former agent I spoke to wonders if the author mistakenly dropped an “A” in a reference to the Saudi Presidency of Civil Aviation or PCA, an entity that paid Bayoumi’s salary for a no-show job at a Saudi government contractor in California.
Suspicious calls continued after the hijackers moved to San Diego:
“Al-Bayoumi called al-Sudairy five (5) times while the hijackers were in San Diego with al-Bayoumi. The dates of the calls are significant. The first set of calls are 24 January, 26 January, and 30 January 2000—on these particular days al-Bayoumi met the hijackers in Culver City, CA and talked to them about coming to San Diego. The next call occurred on 2 February 2000. On 4 February 2000, al-Bayoumi co-signed a loan agreement for the apartment he obtained for the hijackers and brought them to a Bank of America to assist them in opening a bank account.
An hour after Bayoumi helped the hijackers open the account, Awlaki called a Bank of America number. Two hours after that, Bayoumi called Awlaki.
Bayoumi’s final call to al-Sudairy at the Saudi embassy came on February 7, 2000, after the hijackers were fully settled in the same apartment complex where Bayoumi lived.
Five hundred eighty-two days later, Hazmi and Mihdhar passed through security at Dulles Airport and boarded American Airlines Flight 77.
Stark Realities undermines official narratives, demolishes conventional wisdom and exposes fundamental myths across the political spectrum. Read more and subscribe at starkrealities.substack.com
There’s much more for interested readers to learn about what went on in southern California ahead of 9/11, including more participants and additional links to the Saudi embassy—to include Saudi ambassador Prince Bandar himself. Check out my previous article: FBI Mistakenly Names Saudi Consulate Employee Eyed in 9/11 Investigation.
“New Evidence that World Trade Center was Not s Surprise – More lies?”
Videos of missing $2 trillion from Pentagon now $35 Video of Building 7 with explosions going off where all the data was kept of missing money audio court docs
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/corruption/new-evidence-that-world-trade-center-was-not-s-surprise-more-lies/
Recently, a tape has emerged from a private camera that was there during 911 filming the collapse of World Trade Center #7 – the only one that no plane ever hit. I have stated that the coincidence with WTC7 collapse was a wipeout of evidence as was the Pentagon which conveniently hit the room with all the evidence about the missing $2.3 trillion from the defense budget.
These two very convenient buildings that were attacked were most likely a major cover-up. That is where they took our computer system and when I asked for my legal discovery, the SEC responded that everything was destroyed in 911. No government employees in that WTC7 building were in there when it collapsed. They were evacuated. The motto seems to be – we do not kill your own, only civilians........
What people do not realize is that BECAUSE of 911 hitting the very room where all the documents were concerning the Pentagon budget, the audit never took place. Worse still, it seems to have endorsed a continual problem of missing money from the Pentagon. That $2.3 trillion in 2001 has grown now to $35 trillion. Clearly, the benefit of 911 has been the ability to keep hiding missing money that nobody seems to care about...........
The collapse of WTC #7 was clearly a demolition to hide evidence. The government’s claim was it collapsed from fire. The problem was the fire would have to have been 800 degrees celsius to do that and the building would not have collapsed straight down. There was also no source of fuel to burn that hot...........
I know what I had which was lost in that collapse which would have taken down all 5 of the leading investment banks in a real justice system. That includes the evidence against all the bank manipulations that the Department of Justice, SEC & CFTC do their best to hide and NEVER charge any bankers personally. The banks pay huge fines at shareholder expense to protect the bankers personally and nobody ever goes to jail. This really amounts to shareholder fraud in that they pay huge fines and those who make huge bonuses from the fraud keep their illegal gains.
My battle with the “Club” was one where they wanted just the perfect trades from inside trading and bribing officials. I also hired Barclay Lieb who did his due diligence on me before joining my firm. He confirmed that Goldman Sachs had thought they could take me down, but I usually won................
There is absolutely NOTHING governments say which can be trusted anymore. They lie about absolutely everything. Russia is starting to fight back with leaking the evidence that the USA has worked with terrorists and knew about 911 if not help the terrorists organize the attack. The Saudi’s have controlled the terrorists and threatened Russia that their Olympic Games would be safe only if they agreed to the Saudi terms. It was the very terrorists being armed by the USA to take down the Syrian government. The Saudi connection and the USA were exposed with the Syria attempted invasion.
I reported that on the Benghazi Connection. The reliable story I got from behind the curtain was that John Christopher Stevens was supplying arms to the Syrian Rebels – terrorists we hated so much. That is why he was killed and the US had to step back and cover that up because the truth would expose the terrorist connection and how they used them for political purposes. I have stated all along there was an admixture here for it did not make sense.
I even reported that the two World Trade Center Attacks were curiously about 8.6 years apart. Not sure if that is significant but it does seem to fit the government cycle. The timing itself is very curious. It even took place precisely on the day of Pi from the peak of the 8.6-year wave at that time. It seems even conspiracies are on time.
I have maintained that WTC7 was destroyed to protect the bankers and the courts. Decades of phone tapes would have exposed the “guaranteed trades” and the Fed bailouts for what they were. My case was just way too critical to allow that to happen. Who knows what else was in WTC7. No plane ever hit that building and every specialist always said it was a controlled demolition. To do that meant that they also KNEW about 911 and when it would take place. They had everything ready both in New York and in the Pentagon and they got more power out of it with Home Land Security. That is why the press is not allowed to ever report on my case – FAKE NEWS.
Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi -
The story of Shreveport, Louisiana dentist, Dr David M. Graham and his personal encounters dealing with three of the 9/11 hijackers reads like a southern-style John Grisham novel.
Prior to 9/11, Dr David Graham reports the “future hijackers” to the local FBI.
Following 9/11/01, Dr. David Graham contacts top government officials.
Later Dr Graham dies a slow gruesome death following “radiator fluid” poisoning in Texas.
https://web.archive.org/web/20161002124145/http://911blogger.com/news/2016-04-24/28-pages-revisits-man-who-met-911-hijackers-poisoned-texas